It's everywhere. Advertising for a new TV show called
Resurrection.
I like to watch TV. The commercials for Resurrection are on
high rotation. I see bus advertising and posters for it too. But it's the
television commercials that pull me in.
There's carefully orchestrated music, an evocative logo and
tasteful production. But I'll cut to the chase: An older couple is reunited
with their son Jacob, who died 32 years ago. Our son died 15 years ago. His
name is Jacob too.
There's been a bit of discussion with other parents whose
kids died. A Facebook friend started it. I think the idea for the show is mean.
I say that I wish a nice man could bring back my Jacob. I tell all the other
bereaved parents that I won't be watching the show. It wouldn't be the first
time I've staged a one-person boycott.
Then a few days before the show's premiere, I changed my
mind.
The closest thing to an explanation is this. The show seems
manipulative, but it’s not every day that a deceased child makes his way to
prime time. The idea proves irresistible.
There was a bit of what I'd describe as internal fanfare as
I gather my favorite TV night accompaniments. A nice glass of wine, some
freshly baked cookies.
I had two different predictions for Resurrection. Most
likely it would be so badly done, so hideously insensitive, so insultingly off
base, that I would be seething after watching and then I'd need a corrective
experience. In case this happened, I told Jeremy I wanted to watch Girls right
after Resurrection.
I considered another possibility. In spite of the build up,
I'd end up adoring the show, falling in love with the dead boy Jacob and Sunday
night at 9:00 becomes Me Time.
Neither one of these things happen.
What happens is that I watch in awe of Frances Fisher and
Kurtwood Smith, the actors who play Jacob's parents. Their acting is superb.
The complicated string of emotions they are able to convey feels spot on. I
wasn't expecting the subtlety.
I identified with the mom. While everyone else is concerned
with the details and struggling with the impossible, the mom moves immediately
into nurturing the boy. She's a mother, not a detective. This is the bright
spot for me.
The really surprising thing was how otherwise flat the show
feels. There's something dull and monochromatic, in spite of the obvious
suspense. My mind wandered to other things while watching.
I compared the TV Jacob with my Jacob. The obvious
difference was that the TV Jacob was eight when he died and mine was two and a
half. TV Jacob seems almost exotic in a way that is probably particular only to
me. Except for the fact that he is dead, TV Jacob is classic and all American
in ways that do not resemble any of my children.
Soon after my Jacob was born, I brought him with me to see
Dr. Panter, my OB/GYN.
That's a very pretty baby, he said, but he's got just enough
character to make him interesting. The show stirs up this nice memory. My
children and I are an excellent match. They all have character.
It was impossible not to imagine what would happen if Omar
Epps showed up at our door with our Jacob. It's heartbreaking to contemplate.
For the most part my mind would go there for a moment, but not stay.
An odd thought popped into my head. I imagined calling our
medical team soon after Jacob's return. The chemotherapy might have worked
after all, I imagine saying.
Resurrection is utterly humorless.
Continuing to imagine Jacob returning would seem like
waiting for unicorns or something supernatural. I've become accustomed to what
is second best, keeping him with me through my memory and in my heart. In that
way, it doesn't require a resurrection. It's not ideal, but it's what I am used
to.
In the end, our particular story with my Jacob is so
specific, so full of detail, so much more alive, that I found little to
identify with in Resurrection. The show isn't great but it isn't terrible
either. But seeing as though Sunday is already a big TV night for our family,
we probably won't be viewing it again. Mad Men is coming and we'd rather watch
that.
No comments:
Post a Comment